【IT168 资讯】今日INQ对迪兰恒进X1650XT和微星7600GT进行了对比测试,PowerColor Radeon X1650XT频率为600/700MHz,128位256M DDR3显存,8管24 shader单元,支持Vista、HDCP,内置交火引擎,为80nm芯片;微星7600GT钻石版频率为580/750MHz,另外对比的还有一款迪兰恒进X1800GTO,频率500/500Mhz。
测试平台为FX62处理器,富士康C51XE M2aa Nforce 590 SLI主板,2G海盗船内存:
Doom 3 |
1024x768 |
1280x1024 |
1600x1200 |
2048x1536 |
X1650XT |
90.6 |
67.4 |
49.2 |
29.0 |
X1800GTO |
105.2 |
77.4 |
57.8 |
34.5 |
MSI 7600GT |
120.7 |
97.6 |
74.3 |
48.8 |
Doom 3 High Quality FSAA 4X + Aniso 8X |
1024x768 |
1280x1024 |
1600x1200 |
2048x1536 |
X1650XT |
62.6 |
43.3 |
31.3 |
11.6 |
X1800GTO |
74.5 |
50.7 |
37.4 |
21.8 |
MSI 7600GT |
76.1 |
50.7 |
37.2 |
21.8 |
FEAR |
1024x768 |
1280x960 |
1600x1200 |
2048x1536 |
X1650XT |
80 |
58 |
39 |
20 |
X1800GTO |
77 |
54 |
38 |
20 |
MSI 7600GT |
80 |
60 |
41 |
27 |
FEAR High Quality FSAA 4X + Aniso 16X |
1024x768 |
1280x960 |
1600x1200 |
2048x1536 |
X1650XT |
49 |
35 |
24 |
9 |
X1800GTO |
53 |
37 |
24 |
12 |
MSI 7600GT |
46 |
32 |
22 |
13 |
Quake 4 |
1024x768 |
1280x1024 |
1600x1200 |
2048x1536 |
X1650XT |
136.8 |
114.0 |
89.1 |
54.5 |
X1800GTO |
140.4 |
118.7 |
94.7 |
59.1 |
MSI 7600GT |
161.3 |
134.7 |
103.4 |
68.9 |
Quake 4 FSAA 4X + Aniso 8X |
1024x768 |
1280x1024 |
1600x1200 |
2048x1536 |
X1650XT |
116.3 |
86.4 |
65.2 |
20.8 |
X1800GTO |
122.9 |
92.0 |
71.3 |
43.0 |
MSI 7600GT |
125.2 |
87.4 |
65.8 |
37.5 |
在3DMark03中,微星7600GT比X1800GTO多600分,比X1650XT多1500分,但是在3DMark05中,最快的是X1650XT,比7600GT多1400分,比GTO多750分,3DMark06中三款显卡的差距很小。
游戏测试中,Doom3里7600GT快50%左右,Fear、Quake4、FarCry里7600GT小幅领先,到了2048x1535分辨率拉开与X1650XT的差距了,很多场景都是X1800GTO胜过X1650XT,总而言之形势对X1650XT很不利,相比7600GT没有性能优势,价格还较高。